Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

Author: wxlt

August undefined, 2024

Webb26 juli 2024 · Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 n.1 (5th Cir. 2013). Ajao did not show that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his first motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. He concedes that he did not comply with the requirements of Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988). WebbFind many great new & used options and get the best deals for 2007 VOLVO C70 MK2 FRONT RIGHT DRIVER SIDE PILLAR TRIM COVER 1385359 at the best online prices at …

De La Cruz v. Lynch, 819 F.3d 784 Casetext Search + Citator

Webb12 okt. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 412-13 (5th Cir. 2013). Rather, the IJ found Katembo was targeted because of his occupation as an election worker. Next, although Katembo testified at his hearing that he was targeted because of his work with CENI, IJ determined based on his asylum the Webb8 jan. 2014 · We review the BIA's order and will consider the underlying decision of the IJ only if it influenced the BIA's determination. Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and will reverse only if the record compels a different finding. onward carriage

Singh v. Holder, 598 F. App

Webb29 nov. 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (citations omitted). Un-der the substantial evidence standard, this court may not reverse a factual finding unless the evidence “compels” such a reversal — i.e., the evidence Webb18 jan. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013); Thuri v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 788, 792 (5th Cir. 2004). Lazo-Casula has not shown that anyone in El Salvador is aware of his political opinion of opposing the gangs or would be motivated to persecute him for that opinion. An asylum claim may also be based on membership in a particular ... Webb28 mars 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A)). The burden is on the applicant to present “specific, detailed facts” to … iot-inc的物联网专业认证

MARQUEZ BENITEZ v. WHITAKER (2024) FindLaw

Webb14 mars 2024 · Zhang v. for Gonzales, 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). Under this highly deferential standard, we need only make sure that the BIA’s decision is “based upon the … WebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 412 (5th Cir. 2013) (explaining that credible testimony may establish the persecutor’s motives); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1). onward care team gloucestershireWebb22 feb. 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). The BIA’s finding is conclusive under that standard unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary. See id. Substantial evidence supports that the Garcia-Rojas sisters did not suffer past persecution. onward care team

"Webb22 mars 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a) (42) (A) ). The burden is on the applicant to present "specific, detailed facts" to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear … " - Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013

Martinez-Nataren v. Whitaker, No. 17-60842 Casetext Search

WebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 413 (5th Cir. 2013). The person must support the claim with“specific, detailed facts showing a good reason to fear that he or she will be . singled out. for persecution.” Orellana–Monson, 685 F.3d at 518 (quoting . Faddoul v. INS, 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994)). The 729 F.3d 407 (5th Cir. 2013) In Sharma, the BIA had determined that the petitioner's mistreatment was motivated by legitimate reasons, and on appeal we readily observed the reasonableness of that conclusion. Visa mer The factual background of this case was established primarily through Sharma's own testimony, which the IJ found to be credible. Khagendra … Visa mer An alien is eligible for a discretionary grant of asylum if he qualifies as a refugee. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(A), (B)(i). A refugee is a person who is outside of his or her country and is unable or unwilling to return “because of … Visa mer “We review the decision of the BIA, and reach the underlying decision of the immigration judge only if that decision has some impact upon the BIA's opinion.” Ontunez–Tursios v. … Visa mer Accordingly, the petition for review is GRANTED, the BIA's decision is VACATED in part, the motion for stay of deportation pending review is GRANTED, and the case is REMANDED to the BIA for further proceedings … Visa mer

Did you know?

Webb10 juni 2014 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407 , 411 (5th Cir. 2013). The primary thrust of Malm's petition is that the BIA erred in determining that he was ineligible for cancellation … Webb30 aug. 2013 · Holder , 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i) ). It may not be "incidental, tangential, or subordinate to another reason …

Webb23 mars 2024 · A. Asylum and Withholding of Removal To receive asylum, an applicant must establish the suffered or feared persecution was on account of one of the five … WebbSharma, 729 F.3d at 411. nexus between his political opinion and the persecution, meaning that he must demonstrate through direct or circumstantial evidence that the persecutors knew of his political opinion and persecuted him …

WebbFifth Circuit. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Arvinder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr. Filing 502974020. Arvinder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr. Filing UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14 … Webb19 dec. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Because Martinez-Nataren has not shown that he is entitled to asylum, he cannot establish that he meets the higher standard for withholding for removal. See Majd v. …

Webb8 jan. 2014 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and …

Webb19 nov. 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). In light of inconsistencies discussed by the BIA, there is substantial evidence supporting the adverse credibility finding, and the evidence in the record does not compel a contrary conclusion. See Ghotra v. Whitaker, 912 F.3d 284, 289 (5th Cir. 2024). onward car rentalWebb17 jan. 2024 · Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013); Tamara-Gomez v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 343, 351 (5th Cir. 2006). The BIA also concluded that “married Honduran women … iot industry 4.0 hackernewsWebb30 aug. 2013 · Sharma v. Holder 729 F.3d 407 5th Cir. Judgment Law CaseMine Browse cases United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. 2013 August Sharma v. … onward car namesWebb30 aug. 2013 · The factual background of this case was established primarily through Sharma's own testimony, which the IJ found to be credible. [729 F.3d 410] Khagendra … iot india expoWebb4 aug. 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Under the substantial evidence standard, this court may not reverse a factual finding unless the evidence “compels” such a reversal—i.e., the evidence must be “so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could conclude against it.” Wang v. Holder, 569 F.3d 531, 536–37 (5th Cir. … iot in driverless carWebb26 apr. 2016 · Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir.2013). II. Petitioner argues that the BIA erred in denying him withholding of removal by rejecting his claim that, because of his reporting of the criminal activity of which he was a victim, he would be threatened with persecution in Mexico based on his “membership in a particular social group [ ] or … onward castlefordWebb19 dec. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Because Martinez-Nataren has not shown that he is entitled to asylum, he cannot establish that he meets the higher standard for withholding for removal. See Majd v. … iot industry report